Whole Foods Market has committed its private-label products to the Non-GMO Project’s third-party system for verifying that food does not contain genetically modified organisms (GMO).
The Non-GMO Project is a nonprofit collaboration of North American organic and natural product manufacturers, retailers, processors, distributors, farmers and seed breeders, plus consumers. Its stated missions are to enable consumers to make informed choices and help ensure the sustained availability of non-GMO food options.
This entry is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
5 hours ago by admin Getting Back to Basics – Why Web Advertising Needs Traditional Media Metrics. posted Mon, Jul 06 2009. by Young Bean Song MSFT. Trying to build a brand marketing campaign without traditional target reach and Gross Rating Points (GRP) estimates is like trying to diet without the concept of calories. The analogy of dieting and advertising works on many levels.…. Favorite Sites. Marketing Science – Digital Strategy, Digital Audit Services, Consulting… go-Digital Blog on Digital Marketing – http://go-digital.net/blog/
6 Jul 2009 by acfou Source: http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=135717. Last Week, Brand, Campaign, Agency, Current Week Views*, % Change in Views** … Favorite Sites. Marketing Science –Digital Strategy, Digital Audit Services, Consulting. Meta … go-Digital Blog on Digital Marketing – http://go-digital.net/blog/
4 Jul 2009 by acfou no difference. they are all small “windows” in on specific information that users want — eg sports scores, news feeds, local weather, etc. – that users install on pages that they own or control. The difference is what the makers choose … go-Digital Blog on Digital Marketing – http://go-digital.net/blog/
22 Jun 2009 by acfou CHICAGO (AdAge.com) — For all of Burger King’s marketing triumphs with its ad agency, Crispin Porter & Bogusky, it has lost — and continues to lose — ground to its largest and most significant rival, McDonald’s. 5-bksamestore-062209. Source : http://adage.com/article?article_id=137472 · Bookmark and Share. Monday, June 22nd, 2009 Uncategorized …Favorite Sites. Marketing Science – Digital Strategy, Digital Audit Services, Consulting … go-Digital Blog on Digital Marketing – http://go-digital.net/blog/
27 Jun 2009 by admin web potato – the new couch potato. digital natives – the kids who dont know what newspapers are or what linear TV is. professional malpractice – preaching about digital when you’ve never tweeted or facebooked. go-Digital Blog on Digital Marketing – http://go-digital.net/blog/
29 May 2009 by acfou Dr. Fou is Group Chief Digital Officer at Healthcare Consultancy Group a group of agencies within the Omnicom family specializing in pharma and healthcare. He helps clients developdigital marketing programs or improve the efficiency … go-Digital Blog on Digital Marketing – http://go-digital.net/blog/ - References
This entry is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
NEW YORK (AdAge.com) — While Ad Age’s Ken Wheaton lamented the multitude of sex-fueled fast-food campaigns last week, apparently the broader viral-video-watching audience is not sick of the schtick. Carl’s Jr. snuck onto the Viral Video Chart this week in the No. 10 spot with its video of “The Hills” star Audrina Patridge eating a Teriyaki burger in a gold lame bikini. Carl’s Jr. is still on the chart (for the fourth week in a row) for a different campaign: Its “How to Eat a Portobello Mushroom Burger” video, which enlisted a number of YouTube stars, is in the No. 6 spot.
This entry is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
NEW YORK A new research report designed to assess viewer engagement as it relates to various media platforms suggests that television presents a more effective commercial environment than the Internet or mobile devices.
This entry is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
NEW YORK Unilever today said it has launched a global review that encompasses almost all of its media business, including U.S. chores held by WPP Group’s Mindshare. The client spent $640 million in the U.S. alone on ads last year.
On a global basis, Unilever spends more than $7 billion a year on advertising and promotions. Worldwide media spending was not immediately available, but it likely approaches or even exceeds $2 billion.
This entry is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
NEW YORK (AdAge.com) — First, the Food and Drug Administration went after Cheerios. Now it appears to be targeting another beloved U.S. brand: Tylenol.
The FDA advisory panel recommendation could present advertising problems for J&J and Tylenol, as well as the rest of the big players in the pain-relief industry.
An FDA advisory panel has recommended that the regulatory agency reduce the maximum dosage of acetaminophen, the main ingredient in over-the-counter pain relievers such as Johnson & Johnson’s Tylenol and Novartis’ Excedrin, to 325 milligrams a pill from 500 milligrams a pill, and to fewer than 4,000 total milligrams a day. It’s also recommending that the single 1,000-mg dose be available only by prescription. The same panel earlier had recommended pulling two prescription medications that contain acetaminophen, Percocet and Vicodin, off the market.
This entry is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
As a scientist, I like to run experiments. And I like to make stuff. So my team and I made a few Facebook apps that solved needs that we had (a few samples listed below) and shared them publicly on Facebook to see if they were also useful to other people too.
I beta tested some apps with a few friends by inviting them directly. Then to get it out to a larger number of people, we decided to try Facebook advertising, the much-hyped, holy grail of display advertising on one of the largest and most active social networks.
- social commerce – I’ll buy what he bought; things I have, things I want
But what I found was eye-opening to say the least. Despite the potential of social ads where the social actions of your circle of friends could make the ads more targeted, none of the anticipated positive effects were observed. Despite the promise of mass reach, there was not the corresponding attention or clicks. And despite the use of demographics-based targeting, there was no statistically significant difference between different targets nor the control sample, running during the same time period.
What we saw were click-through rates of 0.01 – 0.05% — and the 0.01% often seemed like rounding because they did not report more than 2 decimal places. As a result of these click rates the effective CPMs turned out to be $0.01 – $0.19 and average CPCs ranged from $0.05 – $0.25. I’ve been running these Facebook ads for more than 12 months; and millions of impresisons later, there is no observable improvements to CTRs and thus CPMs and CPCs. But since I set up the campaigns to only pay when there is a click (CPC basis), I can let these run indefinitely because I am getting so few clicks, it’s not even making a dent on my credit card (which I use to pay for the ads).
In the spirit of openness, as an advertiser who wants to continue using Facebook advertising, perhaps there are a few things they can do to improve the effectiveness of Facebook display ads.
1. reduce the number of ads per page to 1 — displaying multiple ads artificially depresses click-through rates because users can only click on 1 thing at a time, even if they liked more than one of them. Displaying 3 on a page simply increases the denominator while the numerator does not increase — in the click-through rate equation: clicks / impressions.
2. make ads sharable – in the rare instance a user views an ad, it may or may not be relevant to her, but she may know that it is relevant and timely for a friend. By making ads sharable, she can click and send to a friend, who is very likely to find it useful and valuable, especially having been sent by a friend.
3. let users opt-in to ads in specific topic categories – when users are in the market for specific things, they are more likely to subscribe to pertinent news feeds, offers, etc. related to that topic or category. By giving users more power over what they want to see, it will also give advertisers more targeted and engaged prospects to target.
4. expand search-based advertising – when users search they are looking for something and are open to discovering something they didn’t know to ask for. So ads served up in response to a search is usually a lot more effective than ads served up simply when a page is loaded (display advertising). Facebook can serve display ads based on pertinent search queries.
Earth to Facebook… anyone listening?
By Dr. Augustine Fou. Dr. Fou is Group Chief Digital Officer at Healthcare Consultancy Group a group of agencies within the Omnicom family specializing in pharma and healthcare. He helps clients develop digital marketing programs or improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness existing campaigns via advanced analytics, social marketing, and digital strategy. You can read more of his writing on digital marketing on this blog and follow him on twitter @acfou.
This entry is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
In days of old, advertisers had to buy TV airtime, magazine placements, or radio spots to send their ads out to reach customers. Usually one of the largest chunks of cost is the media placement, followed by “creative” development and content creation.
What if there was a way to cut out most or all of the media cost? And what if we could also substantially reduce the cost of “creative development” and “content creation?” Look at the JetBlue example below. On Twitter, JetBlue has nearly 600,000 followers. Each of these followers has basically “opted in” to receive their updates, often multiple times a day (“costless media”). There is no “media cost” for getting these messages out. Compare this to what it would cost to air a TV ad that reaches 600,000 viewers (assuming all the viewers wanted to receive the ad, and were sitting there in front of the TV watching the ad when it was aired).
Also, the cost of content is nearly zero too. JetBlue has their customer service people (and fans) help create content by tweeting. These tweets range from customer service (“twitter customer service”) , to service notices (e.g. dense fog in NYC area airports causing delays, etc.), to tips from frequent travelers. This type of content is more “real,” valuable, and trusted than an advertisement. And there is no cost of “creative development” because the content does not need to be dressed up into a glossy ad for TV or print — it’s just 140 characters of text at a time. It’s more effective AND lower cost?! Imagine that!
Finally, notice in the “bio” area on the upper right of the screen shot that it reports who is currently on duty — “Morgan and Lindsey” — this gives the normally faceless customer service system a name and a face and perhaps even a personality. JetBlue’s twitter is a great example of social marketing done awesome!